Harbridge & Quill (fictional demo) Alterspective
InSpective · Sharedo AuditSnapshot · 2026-08-12
Engagement · harbridge-quill-demo

Where to look next

This page is the story. Each card opens one lens that answers one question, and the ledger at the end proves any figure in either.

InSpective · Executive summary

Your Sharedo platform, audited with evidence.

Configuration, lifecycle, parties, and the book itself, extracted from the data, measured against the standards, and returned as findings you can act on and defend. Every finding on the pages that follow is computed from this corpus; nothing in them is illustrative.

Each domain is scored against its own checks, so the numbers are kept apart. We do not average them into a single figure.

Health at a glance

14Findings surfaced
2High or critical
3Domains audited

Headline findings

The findings a reader should not miss, ranked by severity, each linked to its full evidence.

Config Usage · high

1 attribute stores values two different ways at once (a literal boolean AND a numeric option-set code).

See the evidence →
Lifecycle · high

2 of 3 phases with open work have a median age at or above 365 days.

See the evidence →
Usage Journey · medium

52% of working sittings start the same way: open a matter. The next most common way in is close a matter, at 30%.

See the evidence →
Config Usage · medium

95 of 287 attribute fields are never populated (0% fill rate).

See the evidence →
Config Usage · medium

5 logical field names are stored under 10 distinct raw keys.

See the evidence →

Audit domains

Configuration and Lifecycle are in the productised pipeline today; the rest are proven on a live engagement and being generalised. Every number is real, computed from this corpus.

Delta report: what changed since the baseline →Data & sources

Continue the reportNext: Config Usage →
← Back to the InSpective site